From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: 8.4 release planning |
Date: | 2009-01-29 15:22:53 |
Message-ID: | 200901291022.54530.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thursday 29 January 2009 08:39:48 Gregory Stark wrote:
> I wish we could get rid of the whole concept and stigma of being "bumped"
> your patch will be released in the next release after it's committed. What
> does it matter if there's been another release since you started or not?
>
This is the whole point. It isn't that there is a stigma to getting bumped; It
matters becase missing a release means 12-14 months before your feature will
be released, even when it takes far less time than that to complete the work.
That 12-14 month delay has real implications on a number of levels for users
and developers.
--
Robert Treat
Conjecture: http://www.xzilla.net
Consulting: http://www.omniti.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Daniel Chiaramello | 2009-01-29 16:14:02 | Re: chinese parser for text search ! |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-01-29 14:33:55 | Re: Hot standby, recovery infra |