Re: pg_upgrade project status

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)sun(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade project status
Date: 2009-01-27 20:54:41
Message-ID: 200901272254.42517.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tuesday 27 January 2009 21:36:01 Dave Page wrote:
> If it's been around for a year, why hasn't it been
> submitted long ago so we could have rewritten and reviewed etc. in
> plenty of time?

It's in the commit fest listing, and the discussion about which programming
language to port it to happened weeks ago.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2009-01-27 20:56:15 Re: pg_upgrade project status
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-01-27 20:54:07 Re: mingw check hung