| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Joshua Brindle <method(at)manicmethod(dot)com>, Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: 8.4 release planning |
| Date: | 2009-01-27 20:36:39 |
| Message-ID: | 200901272236.42660.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 19:10:40 Gregory Stark wrote:
> It does seem weird to simply omit records rather than throw an error and
> require the user to use a where clause, even if it's something like WHERE
> pg_accessible(tab).
Not to pick on you personally, but this is the kind of review that should have
happened six months ago, not during a "why is our development process
inadequate" discussion on the eve of beta.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2009-01-27 20:36:45 | Re: pg_upgrade project status |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-01-27 20:36:01 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle |