| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Madison Kelly <linux(at)alteeve(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, postgres list <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Odd duplicate database |
| Date: | 2009-01-15 02:44:46 |
| Message-ID: | 20090115024446.GV24156@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Madison Kelly wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Madison Kelly <linux(at)alteeve(dot)com> writes:
>>> PS - If I've run into a PgSQL bug, is there anything I can provide to help?
>>
>> A sequence that reproduces it would be the best thing ...
>
> I guess the trick is, I have no idea what's happened or what I did to
> cause it to happen... Any ideas I can try?
No ideas here ...
Can you please find out the current Xid counter? I think pg_controldata
should tell you.
Also, can you restore the previous state of pg_database, the one before
you deleted the old tuple? If not, maybe a pg_filedump of the table
file (in the hope that it hasn't been vacuumed) could show something
enlightening.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | mailinglists | 2009-01-15 03:36:03 | Query question |
| Previous Message | Madison Kelly | 2009-01-15 01:35:24 | Re: Odd duplicate database |