From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql |
Date: | 2009-01-14 03:32:06 |
Message-ID: | 200901140332.n0E3W6b21052@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:19:51 -0500 (EST)
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > Yep, that is my analysis as well. If you want a pretty ReST-like
> > output, that can be added later.
>
> Not if you use "border 3" for full ReST. I see nothing but pushback
> later if you try to make "border 4" give less than "border 3."
>
> Anyway, we have gone around the circle again and are no further ahead.
> As I see it, the original proposal was a logical extension to the border
> settings, it was extremely low impact on the code and some people would
> have found it useful. Unfortunately I made the tactical error of
> mentioning ReST early on and now it won't be accepted unless it is 100%
> ReST safe which it probably can never be and if it came close it would
> give butt ugly output in cases where it didn't need to.
I don't think it would have been accepted as just a new output format
because few people liked the new display --- they liked it only because
it was like ReST (ah, but then you have to mention ReST). ;-)
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-01-14 03:39:19 | Re: solaris libpq threaded build fails |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-01-14 03:27:02 | Re: per-database locale: createdb switches |