Re: PgUS 2008 end of year summary

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PgUS 2008 end of year summary
Date: 2009-01-12 23:18:21
Message-ID: 20090112231821.GM4919@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 18:34 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> > In the future please do not spam multiple lists with the same message.
> > Or rather, if you want the message to appear in more than one list,
> > please CC them all in a single message instead of sending one message to
> > each.
>
> If we do that, we get cross posting. That is why I didn't.

Cross posting is not necessarily bad; in fact it's regarded to be less
annoying than multiposting, which is what you did. For argumentation,
see here
http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/usenet/xpost.html#why

(If you want it to be even more pain-free, add a Reply-To:
pgsql-advocacy header or some such.)

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2009-01-12 23:51:05 Re: PgUS 2008 end of year summary
Previous Message Robert Treat 2009-01-12 22:58:42 Re: PGCon brand

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2009-01-12 23:51:05 Re: PgUS 2008 end of year summary
Previous Message Adam Rich 2009-01-12 22:56:21 Re: Indexing columns with low cardinality: persistent bitmap indexes?