| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql |
| Date: | 2009-01-07 22:22:38 |
| Message-ID: | 200901072222.n07MMcn29270@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> So what have we decided about this suggestion. Should I submit the
> patch or just forget about it? So far some people like it and some
> people think that it is unneccessary. No one so far has suggested that
> it would harm the system or people's use of it.
I have gone over the discussion about this issue. I think there is
interest in a ReST output format, but only a 100% ReST-compliant one. I
don't think anyone felt they wanted a ReST-like format just for
appearance sake. For that reason, I have added this TODO entry:
Support the ReST table output format
Details about the ReST format: http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/user/rst/quickref.html
* http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-08/msg01007.php
As I remember, no actual patch was posted for this.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-01-07 22:24:10 | Re: Do we still need constraint_exclusion? |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2009-01-07 22:14:28 | Re: Do we still need constraint_exclusion? |