| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Do we still need constraint_exclusion? |
| Date: | 2009-01-07 13:39:42 |
| Message-ID: | 20090107133942.GN26233@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Bruce Momjian (bruce(at)momjian(dot)us) wrote:
> Based on the comments below, are we sure constraint_exclusion still
> needs to be a parameter and can't be on by default?
I'd like to get rid of the option and have it on by default. It's a bit
frustrating to have to remember to turn it on with new installs, and if
it doesn't add much overhead or cause problems then I don't see the
value in having it be configurable.
Thanks,
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-01-07 13:43:31 | Re: Latest version of Hot Standby patch |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-01-07 13:30:01 | Re: error code 25001 |