A.M. wrote:
>On Jan 5, 2009, at 1:16 PM, Stephen R. van den Berg wrote:
>>Upon reading the DFSG, it seems you have a point...
>>However...
>>QuickLZ is dual licensed:
>>a. Royalty-free-perpetuous-use as part of the PostgreSQL backend or
>> any derived works of PostgreSQL which link in *at least* 50% of the
>> original PostgreSQL codebase.
>How does one even define "50% of the original PostgreSQL codebase"?
>What nonsense.
It's a suggested (but by no means definitive) technical translation of
the legalese term "substantial". Substitute with something better, by all
means.
--
Sincerely,
Stephen R. van den Berg.
"Well, if we're going to make a party of it, let's nibble Nobby's nuts!"