Re: Several tags around PostgreSQL 7.1 broken

From: Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Several tags around PostgreSQL 7.1 broken
Date: 2009-01-05 13:59:46
Message-ID: 20090105135946.GY12094@yugib.highrise.ca
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> [090102 18:33]:
> On Friday 02 January 2009 23:33:34 Aidan Van Dyk wrote:
> > Has this gone anywhere? Is the CVS repo safe yet?
>
> Nothing has been done about this.

So, what's the concensus. Are we(you,everybody?) going to leave the CVS
repo alone, or is someone going to muck around in it? If someone's
planning to muck around in it, are we all going to get a day or two of
warning?

a.

--
Aidan Van Dyk Create like a god,
aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca command like a king,
http://www.highrise.ca/ work like a slave.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martin Pihlak 2009-01-05 14:30:09 Re: dblink vs SQL/MED - security and implementation details
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-01-05 13:57:55 Re: generic reloptions improvement