Re: generic reloptions improvement

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Subject: Re: generic reloptions improvement
Date: 2008-12-24 11:01:05
Message-ID: 20081224110105.GA3847@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> I'm not sure how important this is, but if you are enumerating the access
> methods (RELOPT_KIND_BTREE, etc.), how will this work with user-defined
> access methods?

It is important.

I'm intending to have a new routine which would reserve a value at
runtime. This value would be later be passed by the AM to create new
options on the table.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2008-12-24 11:11:51 Re: Hot standby and b-tree killed items
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2008-12-24 10:58:05 Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code