Re: TODO wiki display issue

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: TODO wiki display issue
Date: 2008-11-12 20:29:04
Message-ID: 20081112202904.GM4535@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Brendan Jurd escribió:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 12:26 AM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> > I mentioned this to Bruce because I noticed that somebody edited to add
> > a new subsection, and neglected to add the {{TodoSubsection}} marker.
> > Since a week had passed and nobody had noticed, I thought that maybe
> > those things are a waste of time and space and we should just get rid of
> > them and the indentation they provide.
>
> Well, you may recall that my original port of the TODO into the wiki
> didn't have indentation. Bruce felt that indentation was important to
> delineate the subsections, so we added it in.
>
> So, unless Bruce has changed his mind about that I think the
> indentation is here to stay.

Well, that's exactly my point. I showed Bruce the other version of the
page and he wasn't sure he could tell the difference, so I'm not sure
that keeping it is all that important :-)

If people add new subsections and they don't notice that you need a
macro to fix the indentation, this clues that the indentation is not all
that useful.

> Plus we've already put in the effort to get it working. =)

That's a point, yes :-)

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brendan Jurd 2008-11-12 20:42:00 Re: TODO wiki display issue
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-11-12 20:25:55 Re: TODO wiki display issue