Re: pg_typeof() patch review

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kurt Harriman <harriman(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: pg_typeof() patch review
Date: 2008-11-03 18:52:35
Message-ID: 20081103185235.GT4509@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

David E. Wheeler escribió:

> Well, as someone who was until recently unfamiliar with regtypes, and
> who thinks of an OID as essentially just a number, I would find it very
> useful if the description indicated that, as a regtype, the return value
> could be used as either an OID or as string. Otherwise, I'd find the
> description kind of confusing (in one place it says it returns a regtype,
> "whatever *that* is", and in one place it says an OID).

Give this a read
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/datatype-oid.html

Maybe we should link to this page in the pg_typeof() description. Also,
perhaps this page needs more examples.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2008-11-03 19:02:55 Re: pg_typeof() patch review
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2008-11-03 18:44:54 Re: pg_typeof() patch review