From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | "Laurent Wandrebeck" <l(dot)wandrebeck(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Column level triggers |
Date: | 2008-10-15 14:50:01 |
Message-ID: | 200810151050.01492.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Wednesday 15 October 2008 04:19:59 Laurent Wandrebeck wrote:
> 2008/10/15 Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> > You'll probably have to ask that in -hackers. I'm guessing it's one
> > of those things that if one wrote a sufficiently large check one could
> > find a hacker to implement it. But I can't imagine it being a weekend
> > project, and if it's not already in 8.4 beta it wouldn't make it to
> > 8.4, but you'd have to shoot for 8.5.
>
Actually, the final commitfest for 8.4 isn't untill November 1st, so if you
did have something you wanted to get into 8.4, you have 2 weeks to make it
into the last commitfest; after that you're probably looking at 8.5.
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ivan Voras | 2008-10-15 14:58:46 | Re: Backup strategies |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-10-15 14:49:44 | Re: PL/pgSQL stored procedure returning multiple result sets (SELECTs)? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Decibel! | 2008-10-15 14:50:57 | Re: Is autovacuum too noisy about orphan temp tables? |
Previous Message | Decibel! | 2008-10-15 14:35:13 | Re: contrib/pg_stat_statements |