Re: Better auth errors from libpq

From: Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Better auth errors from libpq
Date: 2008-09-12 03:10:45
Message-ID: 20080911201045.2789e4f7@jd-laptop
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 22:59:40 -0400
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> > psql: FATAL: Ident authentication failed for user "root"
> > HINT: Is pg_hba.conf set properly on the server?
>
> Seems pretty useless. What does "set properly" mean? There isn't
> even any good reason to think that the solution to most auth failures
> is to change pg_hba.conf, so I'd bet that this hint is wrong far more
> often than it's right.

I think something like:

psql: FATAL: Ident authentication failed for user "root"
HINT: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/client-authentication.html

Would be nice. Heck in most modern terminals the HINT would be
clickable too :)

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake
--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2008-09-12 03:20:29 Re: Better auth errors from libpq
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-09-12 02:59:40 Re: Better auth errors from libpq