From: | "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Noisy CVS updates |
Date: | 2008-09-07 12:44:51 |
Message-ID: | 20080907084451.dace9e3e.darcy@druid.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 03:39:39 -0400
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> writes:
> > ...etc. Would it be OK if I went in and added .cvsignore files to keep
> > the noise level down?
>
> Uh, no, at least not before you've explained why you get those messages
> and others don't.
I didn't know that I am the only one. Am I?
> (Personally, I never do "cvs update" without "make distclean" first;
> there are too many other ways to get screwed by updating a live build
> tree.)
I assume that you are talking about conflicts. In fact, that's one of
the main reasons for wanting a quiet update so that I can catch those
right away when I am working on some files. I do an automatic update
daily to keep current with the head. I don't do a "make distclean"
first because I may be working on something and I want to keep the
changes in the tree to try stuff and report patches against HEAD.
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2008-09-07 13:09:25 | Re: reducing statistics write overhead |
Previous Message | Dmitry Koterov | 2008-09-07 12:24:40 | Re: Review Report: propose to include 3 new functions into intarray and intagg |