From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements |
Date: | 2008-07-23 20:44:30 |
Message-ID: | 20080723204430.GD3580@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> writes:
> I didn't get much further than that because I got discouraged after
> looking at the locking issues around the pending-insertions list.
> It's a mess:
These are rather severe problems. Maybe there's a better solution, but
perhaps it would be good enough to lock out concurrent access to the
index while the bulkinsert procedure is working.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Manoel Henrique | 2008-07-23 20:47:22 | Re: Research/Implementation of Nested Loop Join optimization |
Previous Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2008-07-23 20:28:46 | Re: [GENERAL] Fragments in tsearch2 headline |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-07-23 21:01:18 | Re: [PATCHES] odd output in restore mode |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-07-23 20:08:21 | Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements |