| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Mario Weilguni <mweilguni(at)sime(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Crash in pgCrypto? |
| Date: | 2008-06-17 14:40:39 |
| Message-ID: | 20080617144039.GM4918@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
David Fetter wrote:
> It's not quite that simple. Let's say you're *developing* a module.
> I don't see any way to play with it in the separate module proposal,
> where I *do* see a whole extra non-orthogonal feature where none is
> needed. No way to do optional submodules, either, and I'm sure there
> are plenty of other nasty limitations.
Maybe what's needed here is just some more additional commands (i.e.
"add this function to the module", "this module is dependent on this
other module").
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2008-06-17 14:41:19 | Re: sh -> pl |
| Previous Message | David Fetter | 2008-06-17 14:31:41 | Re: Crash in pgCrypto? |