Re: Proposal: pulling newsbytes from www.pgfoundry.org

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Proposal: pulling newsbytes from www.pgfoundry.org
Date: 2008-06-12 21:46:38
Message-ID: 200806121446.40725.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Robert,

> pug information

Where?

> As I see it, promoting core information should be our largest priority,
> which would include the top two items.
>
> our next priority should be promoting postgresql to the general
> populations, which would include large event and pug informations.
>
> after that we have service level information, which is projects,
> products, and training.
>
> now, I left out blogs because they are kind of across the map as far as
> content, but based on popularity of them, they should probably be held
> high on the list, I'd say somewhere below large event information but
> above pugs.

Hmmm. I'd put blogs lower on the list just because their content is less
vetted.

> looking that list over, istm just aggregating pgfoundry and our current
> news feed is the way to go, but there are still a number of areas that
> should be addressed, imho.

Which areas?

--
--Josh

Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2008-06-13 01:28:19 Re: Proposal: pulling newsbytes from www.pgfoundry.org
Previous Message Robert Treat 2008-06-12 18:50:53 Re: Proposal: pulling newsbytes from www.pgfoundry.org