Re: [HACKERS] bug in numeric_power() function

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Richard Wang <ruc_wang(at)hotmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] bug in numeric_power() function
Date: 2008-05-07 22:32:21
Message-ID: 20080507223221.GT20150@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > > I have developed the attached patch which fixes 0 ^ 123.3.
> >
> > Did you actually read the wikipedia entry you cited?

But that's about 0^0, not about 0^123.3. See this other subsection:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponentiation#Powers_of_zero

0^123.3 is 0, not 1.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2008-05-07 23:19:02 Re: [HACKERS] bug in numeric_power() function
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2008-05-07 22:22:05 Re: [HACKERS] bug in numeric_power() function

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2008-05-07 23:19:02 Re: [HACKERS] bug in numeric_power() function
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2008-05-07 22:22:05 Re: [HACKERS] bug in numeric_power() function