Re: Commit fest queue

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Commit fest queue
Date: 2008-04-10 21:29:07
Message-ID: 20080410212907.GA17256@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Gregory Stark wrote:

> And indeed the closest analogue I can think of to our habit of mailing around
> patches is the Linux kernel where people often do post proposed patches and
> patches get signed off by a second developer. Each maintainer keeps track on
> his own todo list of patches to take and patches to send upstream though.

The difference between Linux and us is that we're so few people.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2008-04-10 21:48:24 Re: Separate psql commands from arguments
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2008-04-10 21:19:38 Re: Commit fest queue