Re: Feature freeze status

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Feature freeze status
Date: 2008-04-08 03:36:25
Message-ID: 20080407203625.4173c649@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 7 Apr 2008 22:05:09 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:

> > Better tools would be good, but unless someone commits to producing
> > a tool that will be ready by June but not by May, that's not a good
> > reason to slide either.
>
> Fine with me --- I just wanted to give Tom a break.
>

We could just ban him from reviewing for a fest :P.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2008-04-08 04:37:13 Re: [HACKERS] pgsql: Implement a few changes to how shared libraries and dynamically
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-04-08 03:33:35 Re: pgsql: Implement a few changes to how shared libraries and dynamically