Re: modules

From: "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net>
To: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: "Aidan Van Dyk" <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Jeremy Drake" <pgsql(at)jdrake(dot)com>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
Subject: Re: modules
Date: 2008-04-05 07:03:05
Message-ID: 20080405030305.b06cf688.darcy@druid.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Sat, 05 Apr 2008 02:17:10 +0100
Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> I was inclined to dismiss it myself but I think the point that's come up here
> is interesting. The ISP has to not just install an RPM or type make install in
> some source tree -- but actually log into each customer's database and run an
> SQL script. That does seem like more work and more risk than a lot of ISPs
> will be willing to take on.

Why wouldn't you just run it against template1 so that it is available
in every database created after that?

--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.

In response to

  • Re: modules at 2008-04-05 01:17:10 from Gregory Stark

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PFC 2008-04-05 07:18:07 Re: modules
Previous Message Brent Wood 2008-04-05 06:41:35 Re: pg_dump and schemas

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PFC 2008-04-05 07:18:07 Re: modules
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2008-04-05 05:02:55 Re: column level privileges