Re: Cast as compound type

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Cast as compound type
Date: 2008-03-30 20:15:24
Message-ID: 20080330201524.GB12289@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 10:00:33PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Hello
>
> maybe I don't understand well your idea. There exist simple syntax -
> table function
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2007-02/msg00341.php
>
> and it is standard

It's completely different from your patch, which specifies the return
type at the time you create the function.

This idea takes functions which return SETOF RECORD, that is functions
which determine their return type at run time instead of create time,
and short-cuts the cast that you need to do at run time.

Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-03-30 20:36:13 Re: Submission of Feature Request : RFC- for Implementing Transparent Data Encryption in Postgres
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2008-03-30 20:00:33 Re: Cast as compound type