Re: Reducing Transaction Start/End Contention

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Paul van den Bogaard <Paul(dot)Vandenbogaard(at)Sun(dot)COM>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Mark Mielke <mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Jignesh K(dot) Shah" <J(dot)K(dot)Shah(at)Sun(dot)COM>
Subject: Re: Reducing Transaction Start/End Contention
Date: 2008-03-24 17:41:47
Message-ID: 200803241741.m2OHfls07630@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Thread URL added to TODO:

* SMP scalability improvements

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Paul van den Bogaard wrote:
> Just started a blog session on my findings running Postgres 8.3(beta)
> on a mid range Sun Fire server. Second entry is about the time lost
> on LWLock handling. When concurrency increases you can see the
> ProcArrayLock wait queue to start and explode.
>
> http://blogs.sun.com/paulvandenbogaard/entry/
> leight_weight_lock_contention
>
> I will add more posts on all the other LWlock findings and the
> instrumentation method being used. Unfortunately a high priority
> project popped up I need to focus on. So please be patient. Hope to
> finish this in the first week of april.
>
> Thanks,
> Paul
>
>
> On 13-mrt-2008, at 16:56, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Mark Mielke <mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc> writes:
> >> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >>> How about this wording:
> >>> "Review Simon's claims to improve performance
> >
> >> What sort of evidence is usually compelling? It seems to me that this
> >> sort of change only benefits configurations with dozens or more
> >> CPUs/cores?
> >
> > The main point in my mind was that that analysis was based on the code
> > as it then stood. Florian's work to reduce ProcArrayLock contention
> > might have invalidated some or all of the ideas. So it needs a fresh
> > look.
> >
> > regards, tom lane
> >
> > --
> > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> > To make changes to your subscription:
> > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------------
> Paul van den Bogaard
> Paul(dot)vandenBogaard(at)sun(dot)com
> ISV-E -- ISV Engineering, Opensource Engineering group
>
> Sun Microsystems, Inc phone: +31
> 334 515 918
> Saturnus 1
> extentsion: x (70)15918
> 3824 ME Amersfoort mobile: +31
> 651 913 354
> The Netherlands
> fax: +31 334 515 001
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Sullivan 2008-03-24 17:44:05 Re: New email list for emergency communications
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2008-03-24 17:39:59 Re: [CORE] New email list for emergency communications