| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL 8.3.1, 8.2.7 Update Release |
| Date: | 2008-03-19 18:13:27 |
| Message-ID: | 200803191113.28554.josh@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-announce pgsql-www |
Josh,
> Then let's make it a open, no subscribe list. It wouldn't behave any
> differently than it does now but would allow us to service the
> announcement review etc...
Absolutely not. Requests made to press@ are often semi-confidential;
companies don't want to share their requests about export certification
with Google, and reporters *definitely* don't want to share their story
ideas with their collegues!
I'm really confused on why you're trying to turn a confidential,
quick-response alias into a public mailing list, when you'd just force us
to create another alias.
It sounds like -slaves is the way to go. Anyone have any other ideas?
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-03-19 18:26:10 | Re: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL 8.3.1, 8.2.7 Update Release |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2008-03-19 07:32:18 | Re: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL 8.3.1, 8.2.7 Update Release |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-03-19 18:26:10 | Re: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL 8.3.1, 8.2.7 Update Release |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-03-19 11:29:32 | Re: Why do we have two mailing list, lists? |