| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PROC_VACUUM_FOR_WRAPAROUND doesn't work expectedly |
| Date: | 2008-03-14 16:41:51 |
| Message-ID: | 20080314164151.GL4843@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > That's really, really ugly. I'd rather see the flag passed down to
> > vacuum_rel as a regular function argument. I realize you'll need
> > to touch the signatures of a couple of levels of functions to do that,
> > but a global variable for this seems just dangerous.
>
> Okay, I'll do that instead.
Does this look better?
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| vacuum-wraparound-2.patch | text/x-diff | 9.1 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-03-14 17:03:36 | Re: PROC_VACUUM_FOR_WRAPAROUND doesn't work expectedly |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-03-14 16:39:10 | Re: PROC_VACUUM_FOR_WRAPAROUND doesn't work expectedly |