Re: Why is there a tsquery data type?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why is there a tsquery data type?
Date: 2008-03-12 19:41:31
Message-ID: 200803121941.m2CJfVF06131@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Added to TODO:

* Consider a special data type for regular expressions

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-08/msg01067.php

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tom Lane wrote:
> Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com> writes:
> > Could similar logic argue that we'd want special types for regular
> > expressions too? That seems quite parallel to the tsquery type to me.
>
> Yeah, it certainly seems like something we might want to consider in
> future --- we could get rid of that klugy cache for compiled regexps,
> for one thing. An implicit cast from text to the regexp type would
> cover backwards compatibility issues, I think.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2008-03-12 19:51:14 Re: SET TRANSACTION not compliant with SQL:2003
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2008-03-12 19:37:00 Re: BUG #4027: backslash escaping not disabled in plpgsql