From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: multi-threaded pgloader needs your tests |
Date: | 2008-03-10 16:08:08 |
Message-ID: | 200803101708.11048.dfontaine@hi-media.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-performance |
Hi,
Le mardi 26 février 2008, Dimitri Fontaine a écrit :
> You may remember some thread about data loading performances and
> multi-threading support in pgloader:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2008-02/msg00081.php
As people here have asked for the new features implemented into pgloader
2.3.0, I'm happy to post here about the availability of the new version!
http://pgfoundry.org/projects/pgloader
http://pgfoundry.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=1283
Please consider this as a testbed related to the parallel COPY and pg_restore
improvements which have been discussed here and on -hackers, as that's how
those new features came to life.
Regards,
--
dim
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2008-03-10 16:18:16 | Re: [PERFORM] multi-threaded pgloader makes it in version 2.3.0 |
Previous Message | frant101 | 2008-03-10 16:04:02 | Reindexdb + relation error |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2008-03-10 16:18:16 | Re: [PERFORM] multi-threaded pgloader makes it in version 2.3.0 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-03-10 15:20:40 | Re: Very slow (2 tuples/second) sequential scan after bulk insert; speed returns to ~500 tuples/second after commit |