| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: FAQ on Embedding Postgres |
| Date: | 2008-03-05 19:17:17 |
| Message-ID: | 20080305191717.GV4755@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 10:30:43 -0800
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > I believe there is wording that could be used that would not convey
> > that sentiment.
>
> Such as:
>
> PostgreSQL is designed as a client / server architecture and does not
> normally embed in an optimal way. Discussion of other product solutions
> to the embedded problem is outside the scope of this document.
I would suggest something less unfriendly, like "there are other open
source databases that that are better suited for embedded usage."
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-03-05 19:32:08 | Re: FAQ on Embedding Postgres |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-03-05 18:53:07 | Re: FAQ on Embedding Postgres |