Re: [HACKERS] new warning message

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] new warning message
Date: 2008-03-03 19:17:46
Message-ID: 200803031917.m23JHkP19631@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> writes:
> > Would it be reasonable to throw a warning if you revoke a privilege from
> > some role, and that role inherits the privilege from some other role (or
> > PUBLIC)?
>
> This has been suggested and rejected before --- the consensus is it'd
> be too noisy.
>
> Possibly the REVOKE manual page could be modified to throw more stress
> on the point.

Agreed, patch attached and applied.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

Attachment Content-Type Size
/rtmp/diff text/x-diff 1.2 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2008-03-03 19:20:26 Re: proposal: plpgsql return execute ...
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2008-03-03 19:05:50 Re: Snapshot Reuse

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2008-03-03 19:42:16 Re: CopyReadLineText optimization
Previous Message Alex Hunsaker 2008-03-03 19:07:46 Re: BUG #3973: pg_dump using inherited tables do not always restore