Re: How to allocate 8 disks

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Craig James <craig_james(at)emolecules(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: How to allocate 8 disks
Date: 2008-03-01 21:03:47
Message-ID: 20080301130347.0832b323@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 10:06:54 -0800
Craig James <craig_james(at)emolecules(dot)com> wrote:

> We're upgrading to a medium-sized server, a Dell PowerEdge 2950,
> dual-quad CPU's and 8 GB memory. This box can hold at most 8 disks
> (10K SCSI 2.5" 146 GB drives) and has Dell's Perc 6/i RAID controller.
>
> I'm thinking of this:
>
> 6 disks RAID 1+0 Postgres data
> 1 disk WAL
> 1 disk Linux
>
> I've often seen RAID 1 recommended for the WAL. Is that strictly for
> reliability, or is there a performance advantage to RAID 1 for the
> WAL?
>
> It seems to me separating the OS and WAL on two disks is better than
> making a single RAID 1 and sharing it, from a performance point of
> view.

This scares me... You lose WAL you are a goner. Combine your OS and
WAL into a RAID 1.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

- --
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director | PostgreSQL political pundit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHycSzATb/zqfZUUQRAs14AJ9pm3huW+z1j7jUIY7FbIZMzz2IxgCgnOhD
yWiDabTYAG+x12JEqrf4q8E=
=gBPs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig James 2008-03-01 21:53:32 Re: How to allocate 8 disks
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2008-03-01 18:47:56 Re: How to allocate 8 disks