Re: We should get active / Wiki choice

On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:59:57PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:46:08PM +0100, Koen Martens wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:36:31PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:31:50AM +0000, Dave Page wrote:
> > > > That and it runs on Postgres which I think is an important
> > > > consideration. Yuck, dog food :-p
> > >
> > > That's a requirement, I thought ;-) at least TWiki does, though there was
> > > some chatter lately about them not being so interested in it?
> >
> > TWiki does not use a database backend. About the PostgreSQL thing,
>
> Really? How does it actually store things then, and deal with concurrency
> etc?

It uses rcs for both..

Although plans are underway for a DB store, which is quite easy since
the store layer is abstracted such that you can plug in your favourite
storage methods. Apparently, no-one has been interested enough in a db
store yet, since there is none.

Gr,

Koen

--
K.F.J. Martens, Sonologic, http://www.sonologic.nl/
Networking, hosting, embedded systems, unix, artificial intelligence.
Public PGP key: http://www.metro.cx/pubkey-gmc.asc
Wondering about the funny attachment your mail program
can't read? Visit http://www.openpgp.org/