| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Koen Martens <gmc(at)sonologic(dot)nl> |
| Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Jean-Paul Argudo <jean-paul(at)postgresqlfr(dot)org>, Susanne Ebrecht <miracee(at)miracee(dot)de>, Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(at)dalibo(dot)com>, damien(at)dalibo(dot)info, pgeu-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: We should get active / Wiki choice |
| Date: | 2008-02-26 11:59:57 |
| Message-ID: | 20080226115957.GO528@svr2.hagander.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgeu-general |
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:46:08PM +0100, Koen Martens wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:36:31PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:31:50AM +0000, Dave Page wrote:
> > > That and it runs on Postgres which I think is an important
> > > consideration. Yuck, dog food :-p
> >
> > That's a requirement, I thought ;-) at least TWiki does, though there was
> > some chatter lately about them not being so interested in it?
>
> TWiki does not use a database backend. About the PostgreSQL thing,
Really? How does it actually store things then, and deal with concurrency
etc?
> the remark was made by someone from twiki.net, a commercial entity that
> only recently started business, and in no way reflects what the open
> source community thinks about this.
Ah, now that you mention it, I remember that's what it was. So that
argument is moot then.
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jean-Paul Argudo | 2008-02-26 12:14:19 | Re: We should get active / Wiki choice |
| Previous Message | Koen Martens | 2008-02-26 11:46:08 | Re: We should get active / Wiki choice |