-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:32:59 -0800
Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 17:16 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > I've not been advocating improving pg_restore, which is where the
> > -Fc tricks come in.
> Oh, then it was a miscommunication on my part, because I was talking
> about pg_restore, and I assumed you were as well.
IMO the place to start is COPY which is per my tests, slow. Multi
worker connection restore is great and I have proven that with some
work it can provide o.k. results but it is certainly not acceptable.
Let's not fix the middle and ignore the beginning.
Joshua D. Drake
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director | PostgreSQL political pundit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Neil Conway||Date: 2008-02-26 18:54:02|
|Subject: Re: code cleanup of timestamp code|
|Previous:||From: Robert Lor||Date: 2008-02-26 18:44:16|
|Subject: Re: Proposed changes to DTrace probe implementation|