Re: pg_dump additional options for performance

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_dump additional options for performance
Date: 2008-02-26 18:32:59
Message-ID: 1204050779.16886.24.camel@dogma.ljc.laika.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 17:16 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> I've not been advocating improving pg_restore, which is where the -Fc
> tricks come in.

Oh, then it was a miscommunication on my part, because I was talking
about pg_restore, and I assumed you were as well.

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Lor 2008-02-26 18:44:16 Re: Proposed changes to DTrace probe implementation
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2008-02-26 18:29:39 Re: pg_dump additional options for performance