Re: 7 hrs for a pg_restore?

From: Douglas J Hunley <doug(at)hunley(dot)homeip(dot)net>
To: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 7 hrs for a pg_restore?
Date: 2008-02-20 13:28:17
Message-ID: 200802200828.17219.doug@hunley.homeip.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Tuesday 19 February 2008 17:53:45 Greg Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Douglas J Hunley wrote:
> > The db resides on a HP Modular Storage Array 500 G2. 4x72.8Gb 15k rpm
> > disks. 1 raid 6 logical volume. Compaq Smart Array 6404 controller
>
> You might consider doing some simple disk tests on the array just to prove
> it's working well. Reports here suggest the HP/Compaq arrays have been
> somewhat inconsistant in performance, and it would be helpful to know if
> you've got a good or a bad setup. Some hints here are at
> http://www.westnet.com/~gsmith/content/postgresql/pg-disktesting.htm

excellent! i'll look into doing this. thx!

--
Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778
http://doug.hunley.homeip.net

Illiterate? Write for help!

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthew 2008-02-20 13:41:31 Re: Anyone using a SAN?
Previous Message Douglas J Hunley 2008-02-20 13:26:38 Re: 7 hrs for a pg_restore?