Re: Lack of docs for libpq C Library

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pavel Golub <pavel(at)gf(dot)microolap(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Lack of docs for libpq C Library
Date: 2008-01-31 17:50:04
Message-ID: 200801311850.04943.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Am Donnerstag, 31. Januar 2008 schrieb Bruce Momjian:
> I put it in parentheses to highlight the URL is only for reference to
> the diagrams and explaination. We can either remove the URL or remove
> it if the URL changes.
>
> SSL is pretty complicated so when I saw something that made it clearer,
> I added it.
>
> > Furthermore HP is hardly the authoritative reference on SSL. Can't
> > we find an RFC or something?
>
> See above.

If anything, we should link to OpenSSL, because they implement the API we are
referring to. I don't know what HP has to do with it.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-01-31 17:58:42 Re: Lack of docs for libpq C Library
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-01-31 17:35:33 Re: Supported platforms list