Re: A FAQ that needs updating?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 12:59:34 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:

> > All redundant information should be removed between the general and
> > press advocacy sections.
> >
> > Add a section on the FAQ page for the Advocacy & Press section that
> > links to the section within the general FAQ.
> >
> > Appropriate rewrites put in place to push all requests for the old
> > FAQ to the new (and proper) one.
>
> I wasn't going to go that far at this point. I was just suggesting
> removing the bottom three items that are related to the 8.3 release.
>

I know I saw but I prefer solutions over fixes :). I do not oppose your
suggestion.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

- --
The PostgreSQL Company: Since 1997, http://www.commandprompt.com/
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director | PostgreSQL political pundit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHn2pAATb/zqfZUUQRAnvVAJ4rVvq+x5XbCh31N5A2i8fcIEFqMACfUJE3
iGKoRZZAPEN+rD3rti8gfLY=
=UBrg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----