Re: proposal for 8.4: PL/pgSQL - statement CASE

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: proposal for 8.4: PL/pgSQL - statement CASE
Date: 2008-01-17 17:59:02
Message-ID: 20080117095902.4ef5ae2f@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:44:41 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:

> pl/PgSQL already is aimed at being Oracle compatible so why complain
> that the author wants to use Oracle syntax if possible. If you don't
> care, that is fine, but as a project we do, at least in helping people
> migrate to Postgres from other databases.
>

This appears to be the, "can't follow written points day". Magnus has
already given up on a thread on advocacy. I give up here.

Joshua D. Drake

- --
The PostgreSQL Company: Since 1997, http://www.commandprompt.com/
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
SELECT 'Training', 'Consulting' FROM vendor WHERE name = 'CMD'

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHj5dmATb/zqfZUUQRAgtDAJ9H8igJII+kyAxarEFwtPMhe3GG+ACeLOjq
p9MZzOrDM2z3nDGw2H2c1Og=
=UnFv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-01-17 18:30:51 Re: OUTER JOIN performance regression remains in 8.3beta4
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2008-01-17 17:44:41 Re: proposal for 8.4: PL/pgSQL - statement CASE