Re: Distinguishing autovacuum activity in pg_stat_activity

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Distinguishing autovacuum activity in pg_stat_activity
Date: 2008-01-14 02:23:54
Message-ID: 20080114022354.GD17558@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane escribió:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > Whether the string is "AUTO " or "autovacuum: " seems rather the same
> > thing to me :-) I agree with the general idea. I think "autovacuum: "
> > makes it clearer that it's not part of the actual command syntax, so
> > maybe I'll put half a vote for that option.
>
> Okay by me. Do you want to make the change?

Will do (early tomorrow)

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Mielke 2008-01-14 02:36:04 Re: Postgresql Materialized views
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-01-14 02:18:15 Re: Postgresql Materialized views