Re: test

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Andrew Hammond <andrew(dot)george(dot)hammond(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: test
Date: 2007-12-17 00:47:40
Message-ID: 200712170047.lBH0leE22556@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Hammond wrote:
> On Dec 12, 2007 11:37 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
>
> > Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > > test
> >
> > Does anybody see any value in having hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org be an alias
> > for pgsql-hackers?
>
>
> No, but I see some mild irritation in having to modify my rules to tag a
> second address with the pgsql-hackers label.

The bigger problem is that if the header address isn't modified while
being renamed, and someone then adds the right address, you now have
emails going to both addresses.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

  • Re: test at 2007-12-12 20:02:02 from Andrew Hammond

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-12-17 02:01:24 Re: pgindent issue with EXEC_BACKEND-only typedefs
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-12-16 23:53:22 Re: pgindent issue with EXEC_BACKEND-only typedefs