| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Release Note Changes |
| Date: | 2007-12-07 21:22:55 |
| Message-ID: | 200712072122.lB7LMtE20581@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >> I still think this needs to be qualified either way. As it stands it's
> >> quite misleading. Many update scenarios will not benefit one whit from
> >> HOT updates.
> >>
> >
> > Doesn't the detail description qualify it enought? The heading isn't
> > suppose to have all the information or it would be unreadable.
> >
> >
>
> If you don't want to be more specific I'd say "certain updates" or "some
> updates" or something similar, just some flag to say it's not all of them.
Good idea. I added "most":
Heap-Only Tuples (<acronym>HOT</>) accelerate space reuse for most
<command>UPDATE</>s (Pavan Deolasee, with ideas from many others)
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2007-12-07 21:37:20 | Re: Release Note Changes |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-12-07 21:21:34 | Re: Release Note Changes |