Re: Obsolete references to GBorg in documentation

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Obsolete references to GBorg in documentation
Date: 2007-11-14 03:40:24
Message-ID: 200711140340.lAE3eOJ20499@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Tom Lane wrote:
> Now that gborg.postgresql.org is officially dead, seems like it'd be a
> good idea to update all the references to it that are in the FAQ.

I have updated the FAQ and FAQ_DEV.

> There are also some references in older sections of release.sgml,
> which I'm of two minds about updating --- those are historically
> correct, but as links they're not of so much use anymore.
> Thoughts?

Uh, if we can update them I think we should.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2007-11-14 05:41:51 Re: Obsolete references to GBorg in documentation
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-11-14 03:28:11 Re: Obsolete references to GBorg in documentation