Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Rafael Martinez <r(dot)m(dot)guerrero(at)usit(dot)uio(dot)no>
Cc: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4
Date: 2007-10-23 16:25:04
Message-ID: 20071023092504.4584a5ef@scratch
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:00:59 +0200
Rafael Martinez <r(dot)m(dot)guerrero(at)usit(dot)uio(dot)no> wrote:

> Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>
> >
> > +1. Shorter release cycles are maybe good for fancy GUI oriented
> > applications, but not so good for DBMS.
> > --
>
> We are always 1 year back the main release. We are testing and planing
> the move to 8.2 now, and it won't happen until desember. In a 6 month
> cycle we will have to jump over every second release.

Yes you would have to jump over every second release. I fail to see how
this matters? I don't understand the argument.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
> regards

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-10-23 16:26:12 Re: MVCC, undo log, and HOT
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-10-23 16:22:31 Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4