| From: | "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Hannu Krosing" <hannu(at)skype(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Stefan Kaltenbrunner" <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Jan Wieck" <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, "Marko Kreen" <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |
| Date: | 2007-10-10 05:44:00 |
| Message-ID: | 200710100744010000@869112027 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > > We allow /contrib to be more lax about beta changes.
> >
> > the postgresql ecosystem is growing and there is a lot of people like
> > packagers that will be a quite irritated if we keep randomly adding
> > completely new code and modules during BETA.
>
> Should packagers be concerned with /contrib at all ?
Our users want it. Because we have important features that live there.
> As noted before /contrib is a technical way of ensuring that something
> gets updated together with core, not a recommendation to include it in a
> "package".
Then why did it get added there with the motivation that a lot of users will want it?
/Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2007-10-10 05:59:47 | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2007-10-10 05:04:56 | Re: some points for FAQ |