Re: Query taking too long. Problem reading explain output.

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Henrik <henke(at)mac(dot)se>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Query taking too long. Problem reading explain output.
Date: 2007-10-04 12:30:38
Message-ID: 20071004123038.GA6176@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Henrik wrote:

> Ahh I had exactly 8 joins.
> Following your suggestion I raised the join_collapse_limit from 8 to 10 and
> the planners decision sure changed but now I have some crazy nested loops.
> Maybe I have some statistics wrong?

Yeah. The problematic misestimation is exactly the innermost indexscan,
which is wrong by two orders of magnitude:

> -> Index Scan using
> tbl_file_idx on tbl_file (cost=0.01..8.66 rows=1 width=39) (actual
> time=0.057..931.546 rows=2223 loops=1)
> Index Cond:
> ((lower((file_name)::text) ~>=~ 'index.php'::character varying) AND
> (lower((file_name)::text) ~<~ 'index.phq'::character varying))
> Filter:
> (lower((file_name)::text) ~~ 'index.php%'::text)

This wreaks havoc on the rest of the plan. If this weren't
misestimated, it wouldn't be using those nested loops.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Trutwin 2007-10-04 15:28:04 Tuning Help - What did I do wrong?
Previous Message Richard Huxton 2007-10-04 10:34:29 Re: can't shrink relation