Re: Reducing Transaction Start/End Contention

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Reducing Transaction Start/End Contention
Date: 2007-09-14 03:52:19
Message-ID: 20070914035219.GA12618@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> This has been saved for the 8.4 release:
>
> http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold

I think the work on VIDs and latestCompletedXid make this completely
obsolete.

> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > Jignesh Shah's scalability testing on Solaris has revealed further
> > tuning opportunities surrounding the start and end of a transaction.
> > Tuning that should be especially important since async commit is likely
> > to allow much higher transaction rates than were previously possible.
> >
> > There is strong contention on the ProcArrayLock in Exclusive mode, with
> > the top path being CommitTransaction().

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-09-14 03:53:30 Re: [HACKERS] PAM authentication fails for local UNIX users
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-09-14 03:51:28 Re: What is happening on buildfarm member dugong