Re: PostgreSQL.Org (was: PostgreSQL Conference Fal l 2007)

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL.Org (was: PostgreSQL Conference Fal l 2007)
Date: 2007-08-30 19:56:31
Message-ID: 20070830195631.GU7661@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 12:37:56PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> I would think that a more appropriate evaluation would be:
[&c.]

While I think the criteria are good ones, deciding who will decide
strikes me as a rathole down which we do not wish to dig. It's
almost as deep as the naming hole.

A

--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
Unfortunately reformatting the Internet is a little more painful
than reformatting your hard drive when it gets out of whack.
--Scott Morris

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-08-30 19:58:51 Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-08-30 19:52:58 Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)