Re: [SPAM] Re: BUG #3484: Missing pg_clog file / corrupt index

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [SPAM] Re: BUG #3484: Missing pg_clog file / corrupt index
Date: 2007-08-27 20:50:11
Message-ID: 20070827205011.GB30693@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 05:56:29PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> We moved the "you should upgrade for all minor releases" from FAQ text
> to a link to our web site:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning
>
> The problem is that instead of those words being in the FAQ, they are
> now linked from the FAQ, and I am concerned that fewer people are seeing
> that recommendation.

Could be, but I sort of doubt that's the problem. I'd be surprised
if people who have this problem are reading the FAQ. But in any
case, the Q that is listed there doesn't correspond to the linked
text: the question asks about the upgrade procedure, and the
versioning link talks about (initially) which version you should be
running. I'd break that into two Qs: "What's the upgrade procedure?"
(link to docs) and "What version should I use?" (link to versioning
policy).

A

--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
In the future this spectacle of the middle classes shocking the avant-
garde will probably become the textbook definition of Postmodernism.
--Brad Holland

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-08-27 22:13:43 Re: BUG #3582: CREATE USER via ODBC
Previous Message Feng Chen 2007-08-27 17:39:37 Re: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: BUG #3484: Missing pg_clog file / corrupt index